A-Level Music Technology · Section B
The Essay
On both exam papers, Section A is the short questions — Section B is where the essays live. Three questions carry those marks, and they are not marked the same way. Each one has its own page, built from what the examiners actually reward.
Before reaching for any processing, work out why the mix suffers from frequency masking, typically congestion in the low-mids between 200 and 500 Hz, and only then decide what to cut. Diagnosis matters more than the tool: a cut in the wrong place thins the mix without fixing the clash.
- Core points — the claims you make
- Terminology — the technical register
- Detail — numbers that prove it
- Evaluation — the top-band strand
Three questions, three machines
Same craft, different marking machinery — pick the question you are preparing and its page takes you from the shape to the practice.
Component 3 · Section B · Question 5The comparison essay15 marks · AO3 5 / AO4 10
- Stimulus
- Two recordings — an original and a remake
- The machine
- Levels-based, every year since 2019. The most stable question on the paper.
- What wins
- Aspect-by-aspect comparison of both versions, reaching conclusions.
- Stimulus
- One recording + one named technology
- The machine
- Levels-based, with a printed ceiling: song-description alone stops at 5 of 20.
- What wins
- In-song analysis paired with the technology’s wider impact, point by point.
- Stimulus
- One unfamiliar diagram or picture
- The machine
- Levels-based. The stimulus is deliberately gear you have never used.
- What wins
- Extrapolating how the pictured setup would sound, and judging its suitability.
True of all three
- AO4 is where the marks are — description opens the door; evaluation walks through it.
- Prose is not required. The exam board’s own reports praise tabular and bulleted answers; a full-marks script on file is a table.
- The stimulus is the anchor. Generic revision detached from the track or picture on the paper earns almost nothing.